[PDF] The neuroconnectionist research programme | Semantic Scholar (2024)

Skip to search formSkip to main contentSkip to account menu

Semantic ScholarSemantic Scholar's Logo
@article{Doerig2022TheNR, title={The neuroconnectionist research programme}, author={Adrien Doerig and Rowan P. Sommers and Katja Seeliger and Blake Aaron Richards and Jenann Ismael and Grace W. Lindsay and Konrad Paul Kording and Talia Konkle and Marcel van Gerven and Nikolaus Kriegeskorte and Tim C Kietzmann}, journal={Nature Reviews Neuroscience}, year={2022}, volume={24}, pages={431 - 450}, url={https://api.semanticscholar.org/CorpusID:252118535}}
  • Adrien Doerig, R. Sommers, Tim C Kietzmann
  • Published in Nature Reviews Neuroscience 8 September 2022
  • Philosophy, Computer Science

It is proposed that arguing about the successes and failures of a restricted set of current ANNs is the wrong approach to assess the promise of neuroconnectionism for brain science, and the core of the programme, the underlying computational framework and its tools for testing specific neuroscientific hypotheses and deriving novel understanding are described.

Topics

Controversial Stimuli (opens in a new tab)Neural Data (opens in a new tab)

63 Citations

Brain-inspired learning in artificial neural networks: a review
    Samuel SchmidgallJascha Achterberg Jason Eshraghian

    Computer Science

    APL Machine Learning

  • 2024

This paper presents a comprehensive review of current brain-inspired learning representations in artificial neural networks, and investigates the integration of more biologically plausible mechanisms, such as synaptic plasticity, to improve these networks’ capabilities.

Model-Based Approaches to Investigating Mismatch Responses in Schizophrenia.
    Dirk C GütlinHannah H McDermottMiro GrundeiR. Auksztulewicz

    Psychology, Medicine

    Clinical EEG and neuroscience

  • 2024

A typology of model-based approaches from computational cognitive neuroscience is adopted, providing an overview of the study of mismatch responses and their alterations in schizophrenia from four complementary perspectives: connectivity models, decoding models, neural network models, and cognitive models.

  • PDF
An Alternative to Cognitivism: Computational Phenomenology for Deep Learning
    P. BeckmannG. KöstnerInês Hipólito

    Computer Science, Philosophy

    Minds and Machines

  • 2023

We propose a non-representationalist framework for deep learning relying on a novel method computational phenomenology, a dialogue between the first-person perspective (relying on phenomenology) and

  • 2
  • PDF
Neural computations in prosopagnosia
    Simon fa*ghel-SoubeyrandA. Richoz I. Charest

    Psychology, Biology

    bioRxiv

  • 2022

Computational analyses were able to reveal PS’s representational deficits in high-level visual and semantic brain computations, highlighting the complex nature of processes contributing to face recognition in the human brain.

  • PDF
A Critical Perspective on Neural Mechanisms in Cognitive Neuroscience: Towards Unification.
    Sander van Bree

    Philosophy

    Perspectives on psychological science : a journal…

  • 2023

It is argued that the explanatory scope of neural mechanisms can be approximated by effect sizes collected across studies, not just conceptual analysis, and synthesize a mechanistic agenda that allows subfields to connect at the level of theory.

  • 3
  • PDF
Radical flexibility of neural representation in frontoparietal cortex and the challenge of linking it to behaviour
    Yuena ZhengRunhao LuAlexandra Woolgar

    Psychology

    Current Opinion in Behavioral Sciences

  • 2024
Deep Neural Networks and Brain Alignment: Brain Encoding and Decoding (Survey)
    S. OotaManish GuptaR. BapiG. JobardF. AlexandreX. Hinaut

    Computer Science

    ArXiv

  • 2023

Given the large amount of recently published work in the `computational cognitive neuroscience' community, it is believed that this survey nicely organizes the plethora of work and presents it as a coherent story.

Deep problems with neural network models of human vision
    J. BowersGaurav Malhotra R. Blything

    Computer Science

    Behavioral and Brain Sciences

  • 2022

It is argued that theorists interested in developing biologically plausible models of human vision need to direct their attention to explaining psychological findings and theorists need to build models that explain the results of experiments that manipulate independent variables designed to test hypotheses.

Functional neuroimaging as a catalyst for integrated neuroscience
    Emily S. FinnRussell A. PoldrackJames M. Shine

    Medicine

    Nature

  • 2023

It is argued that fMRI is well-placed to integrate the diverse subfields of systems, cognitive, computational and clinical neuroscience and can help usher in a new era of interdisciplinary coherence in neuroscience.

  • 8
  • PDF
Spatially-embedded recurrent neural networks reveal widespread links between structural and functional neuroscience findings
    Jascha AchterbergDanyal AkarcaD. StrouseJ. DuncanD. Astle

    Biology, Computer Science

    bioRxiv

  • 2022

It is found that seRNNs, similar to primate cerebral cortices, naturally converge on solving inferences using modular small-world networks, in which functionally similar units spatially configure themselves to utilize an energetically-efficient mixed-selective code.

  • 13
  • PDF

...

...

330 References

Artificial Neural Networks for Neuroscientists: A Primer
    G. R. YangXiao-Jing Wang

    Computer Science

    Neuron

  • 2020
Interpretability of artificial neural network models in artificial intelligence versus neuroscience
    Kohitij KarSimon KornblithEvelina Fedorenko

    Computer Science, Philosophy

    Nat. Mac. Intell.

  • 2022

It is argued that the neuroscientific interpretability of ANNs can be pursued in parallel with, but independently from, the ongoing efforts in AI.

Biological constraints on neural network models of cognitive function
    F. PulvermüllerRosario TomaselloMalte R. Henningsen-SchomersT. Wennekers

    Biology

    Nature Reviews Neuroscience

  • 2021

Various aspects of brain-constrained neural models may need to be constrained to make them more neurobiologically realistic and therefore better tools for understanding brain function.

  • 70
  • PDF
NeuroGym: An open resource for developing and sharing neuroscience tasks
    Manuel Molano-MazónJoao Barbosa G. R. Yang

    Computer Science

  • 2022

NeuroGym is an open-source Python package that provides a large collection of customizable neuroscience tasks to test and compare network models, and possesses a shared interface tailored to common needs of neuroscience tasks that facilitates their design and usage.

  • 13
  • PDF
If deep learning is the answer, what is the question?
    Andrew M. SaxeStephanie NelliC. Summerfield

    Computer Science, Biology

    Nature Reviews Neuroscience

  • 2020

A road map of how neuroscientists can use deep networks to model and understand biological brains is offered to offer a road map for systems neuroscience research in the age of deep learning.

  • 204
  • PDF
A comparative biology approach to DNN modeling of vision: A focus on differences, not similarities
    Ben LonnqvistA. BornetAdrien DoerigM. Herzog

    Biology

    Journal of vision

  • 2021

It is argued that the main problem is that the authors often do not understand which human functions need to be modeled and, thus, what counts as a falsification, and DNNs can make better use by adopting an approach of comparative biology to improve the understanding of visual information processing in general.

  • 13
  • PDF
No Free Lunch from Deep Learning in Neuroscience: A Case Study through Models of the Entorhinal-Hippocampal Circuit
    Rylan SchaefferMikail KhonaI. Fiete

    Computer Science

    bioRxiv

  • 2023

It is demonstrated that deep learning-based models of brain circuits may be more strongly driven by particular, non-fundamental, and post-hoc implementation choices than fundamental truths about neural circuits or the loss function(s) they might optimize.

  • 42
  • PDF
Peeling the Onion of Brain Representations.
    N. KriegeskorteJ. Diedrichsen

    Philosophy

    Annual review of neuroscience

  • 2019

It is argued that the concept of representation provides a useful link between dynamics and computational function and asked which aspects of brain activity should be analyzed to achieve a representational understanding.

  • 91
  • PDF
Deep Neural Networks in Computational Neuroscience
    Tim C KietzmannPatrick McClureN. Kriegeskorte

    Computer Science

    bioRxiv

  • 2018

Deep neural networks represent a powerful framework for building task-performing models and will drive substantial insights in computational neuroscience.

  • 159
  • PDF
The neural architecture of language: Integrative modeling converges on predictive processing
    Martin SchrimpfI. Blank Evelina Fedorenko

    Computer Science, Linguistics

    Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences

  • 2021

It is found that the most powerful “transformer” models predict nearly 100% of explainable variance in neural responses to sentences and generalize across different datasets and imaging modalities (functional MRI and electrocorticography).

  • 304
  • PDF

...

...

Related Papers

Showing 1 through 3 of 0 Related Papers

    [PDF] The neuroconnectionist research programme | Semantic Scholar (2024)

    References

    Top Articles
    Latest Posts
    Article information

    Author: Aracelis Kilback

    Last Updated:

    Views: 5917

    Rating: 4.3 / 5 (64 voted)

    Reviews: 87% of readers found this page helpful

    Author information

    Name: Aracelis Kilback

    Birthday: 1994-11-22

    Address: Apt. 895 30151 Green Plain, Lake Mariela, RI 98141

    Phone: +5992291857476

    Job: Legal Officer

    Hobby: LARPing, role-playing games, Slacklining, Reading, Inline skating, Brazilian jiu-jitsu, Dance

    Introduction: My name is Aracelis Kilback, I am a nice, gentle, agreeable, joyous, attractive, combative, gifted person who loves writing and wants to share my knowledge and understanding with you.